La chronique de Mélisande* - Pot bicourbe 13 - Commentaires2024-03-29T09:09:21+01:00Mélisande*urn:md5:7b90779f3aacf4ca8f3a8201c6b396a7DotclearPot bicourbe 13 - mouislouisurn:md5:7136622820b1f4b2f574d1f0efd05aca2009-08-10T01:10:40+02:002009-08-10T00:10:40+02:00mouislouis<p>merci pour ce topic, mais faut que les mentalites change!</p>Pot bicourbe 13 - Mélisande*urn:md5:c679884aeb182502852d0cd3f0d5daf92008-02-27T16:51:00+00:002008-02-27T16:51:00+00:00Mélisande*<p>Ce que je considère comme l'essence de l'art ne serait qu'une forme d'autisme préverbal ?<br />
<br />
Pas de problème, il existe non loin de chez moi un excellent musée pour cela :<br />
<a href="http://www.artbrut.ch/" title="http://www.artbrut.ch/" rel="nofollow">www.artbrut.ch/</a></p>Pot bicourbe 13 - Philip Chapman-Bellurn:md5:a1d8c64d497f81687622b94900c812bb2008-02-27T14:45:17+00:002008-02-27T14:45:17+00:00Philip Chapman-Bell<p>I think I may disagree with you here, on some points. One of the successes of the Renaissance and Enlightenment periods (leaving aside their obvious branding success) was the separation of number from quantity. Mathematical historians point at the move from the geometric to the algebraic approach as the beginnings of modern math. Once they developed a syntax and a grammar, those guys were off and running. Of course, they can no longer read a subway map or make an omelet, but they can can play with their strings in 53 dimensions and they're happy.<br />
<br />
Origami does not, I think, allow for such artificial distinctions. What you're calling trial-and-error (or maybe even intuition), I would characterize as a preverbal geometry. And with each new discovery, you are adding to the library of your own reference finder.<br />
<br />
That said, I think the use of computers and math as a design aid is just fine. But as I may have mentioned, I'm no purist.</p>